TECHTALK #17;
TO PILOT RE UCP

The Pilot Wrote:
> subj : Super Scio Tech - Solving Difficulties in doing UCP Solo

Dear Pilot:

Thank you very much for considering and
commenting on this process.  I respond within.

>SOLVING DIFFICULTIES IN DOING UCP SOLO

>A process known as the Universal Clearing Process or UCP
>has been given out freely on the net.  The source is:

>> Konchok Penday
>> Technical Writer, GODS CHURCH
>> <konchok.penday@net-prophet.net>
>>
>> FOR MORE INFORMATION GOTO GODS CHURCH:
>> http://net-prophet.net/godshome/godshome.htm
>> "Get Your Ducks in a Row @ net-prophet.net!"

>A nice simple summary was put out by Bryan,
><ryanqlee@hotmail.com> on 14 Jun 99.

>>The following seems to be the core of UCP.
>>
>>UCP COMMANDS:
>>1] Tell me a place you have been.
>>2] Compare that place to where you are now.
>>3] Where might you be?
>>4] Compare that place to where you are now.
>>
>>1] Tell me a View Point you have had.
>>2] Compare that View Point to your present View Point.
>>3] What View Point might you have?
>>4] Compare that View Point to your present View Point.

Yes.  Those are the basic commands to DO the two basic simple actions.  As the materials state, the wording could probably be varied quite a bit as long as both coach and client know WHAT they are doing and WHY.  The CORE of UCP is what you *DO*, NOT what you SAY.

>Konchok has taken the admirable action of distributing his
>work freely for use in co-audits.  For that I thank him.

You're welcome.  I note that we have quite
similar and unusual policies in this area.

>He also has the common dramatization

I don't think it is a dramatization.  YMMV.
It IS my REPORT of what I have SEEN to date.

>of saying that his process
>is all you'll ever need and so forth

So far, the longer people run it, the faster and more efficiently it runs.  ALL BY ITSELF, IT *FAR* SURPASSES the gains of "clear," L's, "OT" levels, etc..  My GUESS is that it runs flat at tone +40.  So far no one has approached that.  I do *NOT* claim it is all you'll ever need.

>and bashes at other's work
>(especially Hubbard even though he uses Ron's scales etc.)

I DO unabashedly *!BASH!* MUCH of "Hubbard's" work.  I find the scales VERY USEFUL, though I refuse to call them "Ron's" scales.  I don't know the actual roster of who was involved in developing them, but I KNOW that Ron LIED about almost everything, including the actual sources of "his" technology.  I correctly attribute them as "copyright by LRH."

>But I'll ignore that for now since his work does
>have some value and he has given it out freely.

Thank you.  I note that we have quite
similar and unusual policies in this area.

>I hope he'll mend his ways

I take this as good faith constructive criticism,
but I don't know what you are referring to.
I would be happy to respond if you give me
Specifics Please.

>and join the club,

Thanks for considering me for membership,
but which club might that be?  I figure I have the
BEST club in town, and I'm inviting EVERYONE
to join for "free," by DOING CLEARING WORK.

>there is ton's of stuff we still have to figure out.

I'm sure that's true.  On the other hand, I know
a SIMPLE way to indefinitely raise tone level.
Since that is an UNKNOWN skill within the cult,
it seems incumbent on me to SHARE NOW!

When that goes flat, I'm SURE the
next item to figure out will present itself.

>The big bug is that he insists that it cannot
>be solo audited but must be co-audited.

In the wish-wish-world, I guess that would be a bug.
In the real world, I consider it simply a fact of life.
At least you don't have to study for five years
. . . before you ask the first question.

>And he is right, it is a rough one to solo,
>although I wouldn't say that it is impossible.

I don't believe it is possible, but I do not guarantee failure.  On the other hand, I haven't seen ANYONE do even ONE really good UCP session solo yet.  I hate to see people wasting time, coming to false conclusions, and missing case gain by retesting unworkable actions.

It DOES run fabulously when properly co-audited.
That is ENOUGH to DO something RADICALLY NEW.

>And I don't want to invalidate co-auditing.
>You can generally run deeper doing that.

Compared to what co-auditing UCP does,
I can't get solo actions to "run" AT ALL.

>But if it can be made to solo,

If it could be effectively run solo, I would say FANTASTIC!
I'd be DOING IT!  I tried it myself and failed.  YMMV.

>then the same technique should make it easier to co-audit too.

If you CAN *REALLY* solo it properly . . .
why waste another person's valuable time?

>The biggest difficulty here is that this is a differentiation
>style process.  Those are inherently more difficult to run.

I never thought about that.  It may well be true.
I KNOW the differentiation process WORKS.

>The easy processes are generally spotting type
>processes where you look at one thing at a time.

They may well be easier, but DO THEY WORK?

>A differentiation type process requires looking at
>two things at once and it is, of course, a bit harder.

It may well be MUCH harder, but IT WORKS!
DIFFERENTIATION IS THE *TOP* OF THE SANITY SCALE.
Is there ANY reason to compromise our reality and aim lower?

>It is difficult enough that it can be
>out of the accessible band in solo.

It is also *CRITICAL* TO UCP.  Developing the ability to hold TWO viewpoints, pictures, ideas, scenes, etc., AT THE SAME TIME, EXTERIORIZES the client from what he is stuck in and DEVELOPS his spiritual abilities at an astonishing rate.  He POPS OUT of what he IS BEING, and becomes the being LOOKING AT and evaluating other things.  Rather than BEING his creations, he becomes the creator, evaluator, destroyer, reformulator, etc.

>I favored spotting techniques in self clearing
>and the majority of modern Scientology grades
>processes are in the repetative spotting category.

I see this as a major DEFECT in the "standard tech," and a critical reason why the cults route does NOT move you steadily up tone.   It allows you to wander around in your dramatizations and hallucinations, using THEM to confront your life and experience.  Without the COMPARE action, there is NO datum of comparable magnitude to evaluate with, and therefore no frame of reference, no stable datum, no fulcrum for your lever, and NO evaluation, just PICTURES.

>Take problems and solutions for example,
>it is basically an alternate spotting of problems and solutions,
>considerably beefed up to get more Itsa ("What solutions have
>you had for that problem").

This approach inputs HUGE amounts of data, but NEVER activates the algorithm to perform a FUNCTION on the data.  Sure, the client will sometimes randomly notice patterns or clues in the data, but that goal is never deliberately programmed and called as a SUBROUTINE.

>But differentiation techniques do give good gains, Ron uses
>them occasionally in the 1950s, and I used some in self
>clearing.  In fact Trom's timebreaking is basically a
>differentiation style techique.

WONDERFUL!  They have a long history of success.
[I don't know TROM; it might run GREAT!]

>These things all work and they will solo.  But the key to
>doing it successfully is to come up to it on a gradient.

The gradient in UCP is built in to the client's pre-existing "awareness input buffer."  Whatever his attention is on RIGHT NOW is the FIRST gradient and the easiest thing to handle.  When that is flat, the NEXT gradient will be whatever his attention is on THEN.  TOTAL simplicity!

>Even Trom wouldn't just toss the person into
>their time breaking without any preparation.

Every UCP command is a natural preparation for the next command.  The client picks ALL his own items.  The coach NEVER evaluates or makes ANY attention choices for the client.

>One way to do this would be to do a few commands of alternate
>spotting on the target first before trying to differentiate.

>For example
>
>a) spot a place you have been.

That *IS* the first command of UCP.  We could quibble about phrasing forever, but I don't think it's important.  This DOES EXACTLY the same thing as UCP.  It spots SOMETHING.

>b) alternately spot that place and where you are now a few
>times until you have good reality on it.
>c) Then spot similarities and differences between the two locations.

Your b) and c) *ARE* the UCP COMPARE action.  As the client compares one place with another, his attention goes back and forth between the two, and he spots similarities and differences between them.  The more he looks, the more he sees.  You describe the action in different words, but that is EXACTLY what the client IS DOING when he runs UCP.

>Then spot another place, etc.

This *IS* the NEXT UCP command.

>In this form it should solo fairly easily.

I don't see how this is ANY different in
practice from UCP as I do and describe it.

>Without this, many people would just skid off in solo
>and the process wouldn't bite.  In a co-audit, doing it
>this way should run a bit faster and deeper.

I still don't see ANY real difference between
your description above and UCP as I run it.

>It occurs to me that this might also run well
>on "time" instead of "place" or "viewpoint".

Yes.  I agree completely.  I dwell on this in the Techtalk articles.  The commands could probably be phrased in MANY DIFFERENT WAYS to DO EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

>It also occurs to me that it might be fun without the limiter
>of where you have been.  In other words, spot any place.

Yes.  The FUTURE/ CREATE command invokes and allows ANY place: real, unreal, possible, impossible, shunned, wished, etc.  The alternation between past/ effect/ created and future/ create/ cause places keeps the client from interiorizing into either one, and performs constant reach and withdraw on each of them, AND PRESENT TIME TOO!

>Have Fun,
>
>The Pilot

I much enjoy your articles.  Thank you for your many contributions.
I like your attitude toward tech and its real purpose very much.
We disagree on some fundamental technical issues.
Sorry you were outed.  Hope you are free and well.

Best Wishes,

WHY MISS OUT?
DO UCP & SEE!

O
    ---  )
\

Konchok Penday
<KP@net-prophet.net>
Research & Technical Writing
Recipient of the Alex Yakovlev
Technical Excellence Award :-)

*TEST* THE UNIVERSAL CLEARING PROCESS!
http://net-prophet.net/godshome/godshome.htm
GET YOUR DUCKS IN A ROW! @ net-prophet.net
UCP USENET POSTS @ alt.clearing.technology
THE UCP WITNESS SCHOOL IS NOW OPEN!
GLOBAL SERVICE AT REASONABLE RATES . . .
DO A 24-HOUR KP APPRENTICESHIP BY PHONE!
RE-EVALUATION COUNSELLORS, LEARN UCP!