Recent Posts



  • FDA DATA PROVES MMS KILLS DISEASES
  • KP2010AUG26 SO CLOSE!
  • KP2010AUG22 THUNDERSTANDING
  • KP2010AUG22 UCP CITIES
  • KP2010AUG21 BOY WAS I DUMB!
  • KP2010AUG17 DEAR JIM
  • Jim Humble’s FDA Response
  • KP2010AUG11 SELECT ONE
  • KP2010AUG10 JAKARTA: CITY OF NOW!
  • KP2010AUG05 HOLY COW WOW!
  • KP2010JUL29 SUMOTION
  • KP2010JUL14 I BIN THINKIN
  • KP2010JUL05 I NEED A NEW FAMILY.
  • KP2010JUL04 TELEPATHY
  • KP2010JUL30 DEAR BROTHER JACOB JUDICIAL

Categories

Re: “The Source of Gravitational Energy”

On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:44:03 -0500,
Tenrac [tenrac@verizon.net] wrote:

> “The Source of Gravitational Energy”
>
>      (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
>
>      When one applies the correct relativistic transformations to
> the gravitational field, the source of gravitational energy becomes
> apparent.

FLUNK!

YOU’VE ALREADY GONE OFF THE DEEP END
INTO “RELATIVISTIC TRANSFORMATIONS”!

AND YOU HAVE *NO CLUE* AT ALL OF
THE SOURCE OF GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY!

STOP WANKING AND READ RADO NOW!

> Unfortunately, due to a sophomoric error in the derivation of
> General Relativity, it has become accepted that the relativistic
> transformations for gravity are:
>
>      Force  = 1
>      Length = 1
>      Time   = G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2

BUT THIS IS ALL IRRELEVANT!

> Unfortunately, the error in its generation made the mathematics
> impossible of solution within the constraints of three dimensional
> Euclidian Geometry and it took 18 months for a solution to be
> obtained.  (The 18 months were not used up in solving the matrix
> equation, as current writings would have you believe, they
> represented the length of time it took for Dr. Einstein to adapt
> the geometry of Riemann (which is based upon the faulty
> description of a straight line implicit in all current
> geometries but which does not effect Euclidean Geometry).
> In applying Riemannian Geometry , Dr. Einstein added the
> fiction of curved space and added the spurious degree of
> freedom needed to solve his equations. This approach was
> accepted by a conference on the subject with the statement
> “why shouldn’t we consider space to be curved, no one can
> prove it isn’t. (Actually the proof is quite simple and is
> provided in http:/einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm).
> The acceptance of curved space required a term for the
> curvature as a function of the gravitational field.
> Surprise surprise, that curvature term turned out to be
> equal to the term for time.

BUT THIS IS ALL NOXIOUS IRRELEVANT WANK!

FUCK EINSTEIN: HE WAS A STUPID IRRELEVANT
PLAGARIST AND WANKER WHO ONLY “DISCOVERED”
THINGS WHICH HAD ALREADY BEEN PUBLISHED!

THEN HE MADE UP STUPID NEW THEORIES!

WHAT A WASTE OF WANK!

> When one applies the legitimate rules of measurement (as would be
> required in any of the more mundane fields of Science) and accepted
> and easily verified physical laws to the study of the gravitational
> field, one finds it possible to rigorously devise a different set of
> gravitational transformations which do not require space to be curved:
>
>      Force  = 1
>      Length = 1/G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
>      Time   = G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2

SO WHAT?

YOU STILL DON’T HAVE
EVEN THE FAINTEST CLUE
WHAT CAUSES GRAVITY!

STOP PREACHING AND
START READING RADO!

> Testing these transformations against observation reveals that
> they yield the same conclusions within the Solar Field and in
> comparison with observations of massive and/or dense stars as
> does GTR to an accuracy well beyond experimental capabilities.
> There is one important difference, however. They reveal that
> the end result of gravitational collapse is not a singularity
> but is a stable object the size of its horizon radius.

IRRELEVANT WANK!

> THEY ALSO REVEAL THE SOURCE OF GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY.

QUICK!  NAME IT!

YOU CAN’T, BECAUSE YOU
HAVE NO CLUE AT ALL!

>  In an F(orce)-L(ength)-T(ime) system of units, the dimensional
>  content  of energy is F*L. Since the gravitational transformation
> for force is unity, this means that the gravitational transformation
> for energy is equal to the gravitational transformation for Length
> and is therefore equal to 1/G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2. If we accept that the
> Principle of Relativity applies,

WE MUST ALSO ACCEPT THAT YOU
ARE A MAD WANKER WITH NO CLUE!

> the locally measured mass equivalent energy of an object must
> remain unchanged as it moves to a different elevation reference
> frame. In order to meet this requirement, the move to a different
> elevation in the field the object must gain or lose energy in terms
> of the units of measurement for energy existing at its original
> location. To do this, a force must result as it moves. The product
> of this force and the distance of fall is the energy of fall.

BUT YOU STILL HAVE NOT
NAMED THE SOURCE OF
GRAVITATIONAL EVERGY!

> If we apply this process to an object falling from a quasi-infinite
> distance to the event horizon, we find that, in terms of the units of
> measurement existing at the quasi-infinite radius, the gravitational
> transformation for energy requires shows that the object converts all
> of its rest mass equivalent energy to kinetic energy. When it reaches
> the event horizon and its velocity equals the velocity of light, the
> original rest mass equivalent energy has become zero because it has
> been converted to kinetic energy (all as measured with the units of
> measurement existing at the quasi-infinite radius). In terms of the
> units of measurement existing at the event horizon however, the rest
> mass equivalent energy of the object is unchanged and the kinetic
> energy is infinite.

BUT YOU STILL HAVE NOT
NAMED THE SOURCE OF
GRAVITATIONAL EVERGY!

> Since Relativity is all about observations made in systems where the
> size of the units of measurement are affected by the elevation and/or
> velocity, Dimensional Analysis is required to deal rationally with the
> process. Despite this, I have received an E-mail from an individual
> who strongly asserted that Dimensional Analysis is of no benefit in
> the study of velocity and gravitational effect. The frightening thing
> in this E-mail is that the sender is probably an academic busily
> damaging the minds of his students.

MUCH AS YOU DAMAGE YOURS!

>      The source material for this posting may be found in
> http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997);
> http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm (1987); and
> http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997).

[ ... SNIP ... ]

GET A CLUE
BEFORE YOU
LECTURE!

READ RADO!

KP2009DEC22+  AETHRO-DYNAMICS RELEASED!

AFTER TOO MANY MONTHS
OF SAYING “ANY DAY NOW”
IT’S FINALLY OUT!

SANTA BROUGHT IT
JUST FOR YOU!
GET IT QUICK!

YOU CAN BUY IT IN PAPER FOR $29.50
PLUS SHIPPING ON AMAZON.COM at:

http://www.amazon.com/Aethro-dynamics-Steven-Rado/dp/0966757181

AETHRO-KINEMATICS [A-K] IN 1994 FIRMLY
ESTABLISHED STEVEN RADO AS BY FAR THE
GREATEST PHYSICIST IN HUMAN HISTORY.

*NOBODY* ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE!

ONLY A FEW LIKE KEPLER, DESCARTES
GALLILEO, FARADAY, MAXWELL, ETC.
WERE EVEN ON THE RIGHT TRACK!

FOR THE LAST HUNDRED YEARS PHYSICS
HAS GONE *BACKWARDS* INTO IRRELEVANT,
UNINTELLIGIBLE MATHEMATICAL *WANK*!

[I WAS A PHYSICS MAJOR AT THE UNIVERSITY
OF CHICAGO IN THE 1960'S, UNTIL I REALIZED
THAT "PHYSICISTS" WERE JUST MATHEMATICIANS
PRETENDING* TO KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT
PHYSICS, BUT HAD *NO* UNDERSTANDING!
I FLED FROM PHYSICS IN TERROR AND
DISGUST UNTIL STEVE BROUGHT ME BACK
WITH SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY MADE SENSE!]

UNTIL AETHRO-KINEMATICS,
THE 20TH CENTURY WAS A
COMPLETE AND UNMITIGATED
*CATASTROPHE* FOR PHYSICS!
BUT THAT’S ALL OVER NOW!

AETHRO-DYNAMICS [A-D] IN 2009
FAR SURPASSES EVEN A-K!

IF A-K IS THE BOOSTER
THAT PUT PHYSICS IN ORBIT,
A-D LAUNCHED IT ON IT’S
INTERSTELLAR JOURNEY!

I PRAYED FOR 15 YEARS THAT
STEVE WOULD WRITE MORE!

NOW IT’S HERE!

GET *YOUR* TICKET-TO-RIDE!

===========================
THESE TWO EPOCHAL BOOKS ARE
*THE* SUPREME INTELLECTUAL
TRIUMPH OF THE HUMAN RACE!
===========================

NOBODY ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE!

EVEN “GODEL, ESCHER, BACH” FADES
INTO INTELLECTUAL INSIGNIFICANCE
NEXT TO STEVE’S *UNRIVALED* WORK!

STEVE PUTS IT *ALL* TOGETHER!
THERE IS *NO* SUBSTITUTE!

IF YOU HAVE NOT READ RADO,
YOU ARE JUST PLAIN *IGNORANT*
ABOUT PHYSICS, *ESPECIALLY* IF
YOU HAVE A PHD. IN PHYSICS!

PHYSICS PHD’S KNOW
THE LEAST OF ALL!

THEY DON’T EVEN KNOW,
THAT THEY DON’T KNOW!

WHAT WANKERS!

IT’S A WHOLE *NEW* GAME NOW!

YOU HAVE GOT TO *UNLEARN*
NEWTON, COULOMB, EINSTEIN,
QUANTUM MECHANICS, DIMENSIONS
4 THROUGH N, AND EVEN
TANGLED STRING THEORY!

*THEN* YOU CAN *UNDERSTAND*!

A-K IS A HUGE [527 PAGES]
ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORY
OF PHYSICS, EXHAUSTIVELY
DOCUMENTING MOSTLY GRAVITY.

A-D IS A SMALLER [153 PAGES] WORK
WHICH WHICH EXTENDS AETHER ANALYSIS
INTO THE OTHER AREAS OF PHYSICS.

IT HAS FOUR MAJOR CHAPTERS:
[1] FERRO-MAGNETISM
[2] ELECTRO-MAGNETISM
[3] ELECTRO-STATICS
[4] GRAVITY REVISITED

ELECTRO-STATICS BREAKS
SHOCKING NEW GROUND,
THAT WILL LEAVE YOUR
HAIR STANDING ON END
AND YOUR JAW IN YOUR LAP!

A-D IS THE ABSOLUTELY THE
BEST INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICS,
AND ALSO THE MOST ADVANCED TEXT!

[NOT BAD FOR A GUY WHO
NEVER WENT TO COLLEGE,
BUT TRAINED DILIGENTYLY AS
A MYSTERY-NOVEL DETECTIVE,
WITH HIS BROTHER LAZLO,
WHO GOT SENT TO THE RUSSIAN
FRONT, AND NEVER CAME BACK!]

A-K AND A-D ARE ALSO THE
FINEST MYSTERY STORIES
EVER WRITTEN! BUT THEY
ARE TRUTH, NOT FICTION!

AFTER YOU READ A-D YOU
CAN WORK THROUGH A-K
TO GET THE FULL STORY.

===================
A-D ALSO COMES WITH
A *FREE* CD OF A-K!
===================

EVERYTHING IMPORTANT KNOWN ABOUT
PHYSICS IN ONE LITTLE PACKAGE!

FROM THE *ONE* GUY WHO
FIGURED IT *ALL* OUT!

THIS IS THE BEST DEAL
IN PHYSICS EDUCATION
THAT HAS EVER EXISTED!

DON’T WAIT TO
GET YOUR CLUES!

O
—  )
\

KONCHOK PENDAY
EDITOR, A-D

NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/?p=2024

2 comments to Re: “The Source of Gravitational Energy”

You must be logged in to post a comment.