On Fri, 21 May 2010 14:10:35 -0500,
hermital <hermital@nonsuch.invalid> wrote:
> Beyond Mechanical Paradigms:
> From Old to New Physics, Part 1
BLASTING OFF
FROM THE REAL
INTO THE UNREAL!
> Based on their new kinematics developed to describe the dynamic
> motion of the accelerated particulate matter carriers of electric
> charge that generate electromagnetic fields, and unaware in 1905
> of the massless electromagnetic spectrum that was yet to be
> discovered,
AND WHICH HAS STILL NOT BEEN DISCOVERED!
===========
NEWS FLASH!
===========
LIGHT HAS MASS, MOMENTUM, AND PRESSURE!
IF YOU DON’T KNOW THAT
YOUR HIGH SCHOOL CAREER
WAS ULTIMATELY WASTED!
That’s why comet tails are deflected AWAY from the sun!
That’s why in high school we had a small vacuum “spinner”
toy that stood perfectly still, UNTIL you shone a light on
it, when it started spinning rapidly, FROM LIGHT PRESSURE!
What century are you living in?
CERTAINLY NOT ONE OF THE LAST FEW!
> the collaborative
> team of Albert Einstein and his learned first wife, Mileva Marić
> (pronounced Marich) – who was his classmate and independent study
> partner at the ETH in Zürich – excluded from their special theory of
> relativity the luminiferous ether postulated by Christiaan Huygens,
> Thomas Young, James Clerk Maxwell, and Hendrick A. Lorentz.
They were absolutely correct that it exists!
But they had some mistaken assumptions about
it, which caused huge problems, so a basically
correct theory was abandoned for 100 years, when
all they had to do was refine their assumptions!
Fortunately Rado sorted it all out!
So there should be less and less of
these Wankertations to sort through!
Are you now blaming Einstein’s Fatuous Follies on his wife?
> The excluded luminiferous aether, however, had served
> as the carrier of Maxwell’s electromagnetic radiation.
IT STILL DOES!
EVER SINCE THE
BEGINING OF TIME!
So did light cease to exist?
Because Einstein cancelled the Aether?
This must be the New Dark Age!
> Furthermore, massless nonmaterial electromagnetic radiation
WHICH IS 100% PURE BULLSHIT!
> is comprised of the uninterrupted movement –
> regardless of distance – from point A to point B of the uncountable
> number of discrete massless photons (nonmaterial primordial energy
> quanta) that constitute the comprehensive electromagnetic spectrum
> at any given instant of time.
OVERLOOKING THE FACT THAT ALL PHOTONS HAVE MASS!
> The innumerable photons, in turn, were thought to be
> emitted and absorbed by the particulate matter carriers
> of electric charge.
YES! THEY STILL ARE!
> One consequence of an absent material or nonmaterial carrier of
> electromagnetic radiation (EMR) in the 1905 special theory of
> relativity (SRT) is the inescapable irony that the ubiquitous
> electric and magnetic fields generated by the accelerated
> particulate matter carriers of electric charge were soon
> treated in classical mechanical or geometric physics and,
> later, in early classical quantum mechanics as the de facto
> carrier of massless nonmaterial electromagnetic radiation.
YES! VERY IRONIC to pretend that electromagnetic radiation
is “massless” and “nonmaterial” when it quite obviously has
mass, momentum and pressure! I knew that in high school!
But the “physicists” haven’t discover it yet?
Maybe they were so “smart” they skipped high school?
> The demise of mechanical process in electromagnetic theory
> began with the first 1905 Einstein-Marić paper, On a Heuristic
> Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light,
> which describes the photoelectric effect and contains the original
> theoretical description of the quantum nature of monochromatic light.
Even though Einstein thoroughly rejected
Quantum Mechanics for the next 20 years?
That also signaled the demise
of rational thought in physics!
> Their revolutionary hypothesis is the
> historical source of the pre-1920s old quantum physics.
????
> The extension of Max Planck’s mechanical energy quanta concept
> through its application by means of the Einstein-Marić
> photoelectric effect to visible light also revived the 17th
> century wave-particle controversy between the proponents of
> Christiaan Huygens’ wave theory and Isaac
> Newton’s corpuscles (material particles) of light.
There is no controversy!
Water is made of very small particles!
And yet it makes great waves, as any
surfer knows well. WAVES OF PARTICLES!
And yet each particle has just ONE location!
If you can’t figure it out, ask your kids!
> The photoelectric effect:
>
> James Clerk Maxwell, following the British custom of the time while
> intent upon adhering to mechanical Newtonian physics despite
> theoretical concepts and experimental findings by Michael Faraday
> to the contrary, chose to emphasize the similarities of Newtonian
> mechanics and the new physics of electric and magnetic energy by
> formulating a dynamical electromagnetic field theory that included
> fanciful mechanical analogies.
GOOD FOR HIM!
HE DIDN’T QUITE FIGURE IT *ALL* OUT,
BUT HE SURE MADE FANTASTIC PROGRESS!
> A half-century later the Einstein-Marić team pointed directly to a
> crucial distinction between classical Newtonian physics and Maxwell’s
> dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field (nonmaterial radiative
> electromagnetic energy)
Conveniently overlooking the fact that light is material!
> in the first paragraph of their 9 June 1905
> photoelectric effect paper:
>
> “According to Maxwell’s theory, energy is to be
> considered as a continuous spatial function for all purely
> electromagnetic phenomena, hence also for light, while
> according to the current conceptions of physicists the
> energy of a ponderable body is to be described as a sum
> extending over the atoms and electrons. The energy of a
> ponderable body cannot be broken up into arbitrarily many,
> arbitrarily small parts,
YES! THE SMALLEST PARTICLE IS THE AETHRON!
> while according to Maxwell’s theory (or, more generally,
> according to any wave theory) the energy of a light ray emitted from a
> point source of light spreads continuously over a steadily increasing
> volume.”
ASSUMING YOU HAVE “CONTINUOUS” PARTICLES!
WHERE CAN I BUY THOSE?
> The crucial difference between kinetic and potential mechanical energy > and massless, weightless nonmechanical electromagnetic radiation was
> accurately stated but poorly understood at the beginning of the 20th
> century, not only by the Einstein-Marić team but also by the physics
> community at large which was deeply immersed in the investigation of
> thermodynamics.
The crucial difference between kinetic and potential mechanical energy and massless, weightless nonmechanical electromagnetic radiation is
that the first exists, but not the second. That’s a HUGE difference!
> Incorporating Max Planck’s intuitive discovery of the thermodynamic
> blackbody quantum of nonmaterial electromagnetic radiation energy
> in the description of their own revolutionary work, the Einsteins’
> “ponderable body” quoted above is the electron ejected by the
> photoelectric effect following the application of quantized
> electromagnetic radiation in the visible region of the
> electromagnetic spectrum. Thus the energy of the ponderable
> body under consideration is relativistic kinetic energy.
“Max Planck’s intuitive discovery of the thermodynamic blackbody
quantum of nonmaterial electromagnetic radiation energy” is just
PONDERABLE BULLSHIT! He “discovered” something that doesn’t exist?
> In other words, nonmaterial electromagnetic radiation and relativistic
> (kinetic) mechanical energy are separate and distinct phenomena.
YES! ONE EXISTS! ONE DOES NOT! BIG DIFFERENCE!
> Just four years after the 1905 photoelectric effect and special
> relativity theory (SRT) papers were published Einstein described
> the nonmechanical evolution of electromagnetic theory in his 21
> September 1909 lecture at the Salzburg Conference:
>
> “The more electromagnetic theory advanced, the more the
> question of whether electromagnetic processes can be reduced to
> mechanical ones retreated into the background; one became used to
> considering the concepts of electric and magnetic field strength,
> electric space density, etc., as elementary concepts that are not
> in need of mechanistic interpretation.”
THAT’S WHAT THE BABBLING BABOON SAID!
THAT’S PRETTY GOOD!
MOST OF THEM CAN’T EVEN TALK!
> The Universal Principle of Energy (TUPE):
>
> Interestingly, a century after the publication of the photoelectric
> effect, SRT, and the Salzburg lecture the unexpected discovery of the
> universal principle of energy (TUPE) in the zeroth year of the 21st
> century not only reveals the existence of the omnipresent, pervasive,
> nonmaterial primordial energy domain (NED).
THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING
THAT DOES NOT EXIST, IS
QUITE A STUNNING REVELATION!
> TUPE also reveals that material mass is a discrete,
> organized aggregation (change of state, phase
> transition) of fundamental, irreducible nonmaterial
> primordial energy (NPE) that is created within the NED.
SO YOU *CAN* MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING!
PATENT THAT PROCESS!
WE’LL BALANCE THE BUDGET YET!
YOU CAN MAKE MORE MONEY ON THAT THAN
GAL BORE DID WITH CARBON CREDITS!
> Moreover, TUPE implies that relativistic invariant electric charge
> is much more than simply a traditional property of matter/mass
> and can now be seen as a natural, physically real nonmaterial
> phenomenon that is created concurrently (simultaneously) with
> material matter/mass in the NED.
BETTER PATENT THAT “natural, physically real nonmaterial
phenomenon” too! YOU’LL MAKE GAL BORE LOOK POOR, AND THIN TOO!
And with all those laughs, you’ll be a superstar in show biz!
> Indeed, the fundamental point-like unit of nonmaterial
> primordial energy (NPE) called electric charge seems to
> serve as the indispensable link, the sine qua non
> between the material domain of matter/mass and the NED.
FUNDAMENTAL POINT-LIKE UNITS
ARE USUALLY CALLED “PARTICLES”!
BUT A HALLUCINATION
BY ANY OTHER NAME
IS JUST AS REAL!
> Succinctly put, the novel first law of the universal
> principle of energy (TUPE) states:
> “Fundamental, irreducible primordial energy exists in the
> absence of matter, but matter is entirely dependent upon
> primordial energy and cannot exist in the absence of energy.”
AW SHUCKS!
THAT CERTAINLY IS NOVEL!
I’M STILL BAMBOOZLED BY
J.J. THOMPSONS 1888
EQUATION OF E = MC^2 !
TO ME, THAT SAYS YOU CANNOT
HAVE ENERGY WITHOUT MATTER!
BUT I’M OLD!
THAT PROBABLY ALL CHANGED
SINCE I WAS A KID!
> Thus the universal principle of energy (TUPE) implies that:
>
> 1. Particulate matter/mass is created, contained, and
> maintained as a discrete conditionally relative phase change
> change of state) of fundamental, irreducible nonmaterial
> primordial energy (NPE) within the omnipresent, pervasive,
> nonmaterial primordial energy domain (NED).
SO PARTICLES ARE MADE OF NOTHINGS!
HOW MANY NOTHINGS DOES THAT TAKE?
> 2. Electric charge is created, contained, and maintained
> as a discrete conditionally relative phase change (change of state)
> of fundamental, irreducible nonmaterial primordial energy (NPE)
> within the omnipresent, pervasive, nonmaterial primordial energy
> domain (NED).
I can understand why a fundamental particle is irreducible!
But WHY CAN’T you ALWAYS divide a NO-THING IN TWO, OR MORE?
> 3. The NED is the carrier of particulate matter/mass.
HOW MANY NOTHINGS DO IT TAKE
TO CARRY A PARTICLE 20 FEET?
> 4. Particulate matter/mass is the carrier of NPE electric
> charge.
WHICH DOES NOT EXIST!
SO JUST ONE PARTICLE CAN
CARRY A WHOLE UNIVERSE
OF NPE *ANYTHING!*
> 5. Each electron, positron, and quark is the conjoint
> coupling of discrete conditionally relative NPE matter/mass
> and a discrete conditionally relative NPE electric charge
> within the NED.
THAT’S CERTAINLY TRUE OF
POSITRON’S AND QUARKS,
WHICH DO NOT EXIST!
ELECTRONS ARE ANOTHER STORY!
THEY ARE ACTUALLY REAL!
> 6. NPE electric charge is the sine qua non, the
> indispensable link between the reciprocally emergent,
> conditionally relative material domain of matter/mass
> and the omnipresent fundamental, irreducible,
> nonmaterial primordial energy domain (NED).
WHICH THEREFORE DOES NOT EXIST!
> 7. In principle our energetic holonomic universe is a
> complex open (mechanically nonconservative) nonmaterial/material
> system wholly embedded within the fundamental, irreducible NED.
SO, IN PRINCIPLE, IT DOES NOT EXIST!
> 8. Complex open nonmaterial/material systems are
> mechanically nonconservative systems in which matter/mass
> and electric charge are not only created, but also destroyed
> as an elementary, separate and distinct coupled pair.
EVERTHING THAT EXISTS,
HAS A NONEXISTENT DOUBLE!
> 9. The contemporary equivalence of relativistic mass and
> the rest energy of classical physics is valid only in a theoretically
> closed or isolated (mechanically conservative) material system.
THANK GOD!
THAT’S WHAT WE GOT!
> 10. Global mass-energy equivalence is neither valid nor
> sufficient in a complex open (mechanically nonconservative)
> nonmaterial/material system embedded within the NED.
THANK GOD!
THAT’S WHAT WE DON’T GOT!
> 11. The paradoxical contradictions inherent in the
> wave-particle duality concept of classical physics and
> traditional quantum mechanics are completely resolved
> in the omnipresent, pervasive NED by the identical
> nature (irreducible sameness) of matter/mass and
> fundamental, irreducible, nonmaterial primordial energy (NPE).
SO: SOMETHING = NOTHING!
THAT RESOLVES *ALL* MY CONTRADICTIONS!
> 12. So-called empty space is simply the conspicuous
> panoptic obverse of the massless omnipresent, pervasive NED.
OF COURSE “EMPTY SPACE”
IS CHOCK FULL OF AETHER,
WHICH ALL HAS MASS!
> More precisely, the universal principle of energy (TUPE) points beyond
> classical physics, beyond conventional quantum mechanics and the
> material domain to the omnipresent, pervasive nonmaterial primordial
> energy (NPE) that constitutes the fundamental, irreducible,
> nonmaterial primordial energy domain (NED).
THE ENTIRE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE
IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY
NONMATERIAL, PRIMORDIAL *NOTHING!*
> The discrete, conditionally relative NPE states (phase changes) that
> comprise the nonmaterial/material holonomic universe, including the
> unique conjoined, yet physically separate and distinct localized
> states that humankind sees as electric charge and matter/mass,
> are produced within the NED.
WHICH DOES NOT EXIST!
SO THE UNIVERSE ITSELF
IS JUST A HALLUCINATION!
> Three presently known families of particles can be seen to
> exhibit the conjoint creation of electric charge and matter/mass;
> namely, the lepton and quark fermion families, and the W boson family.
SINCE NONE OF THESE EXIST,
WE’LL DEAL WITH THEM IN
THE NEXT NONEXISTENT LESSON!
> The relativistic propagation of massless electromagnetic radiation
> (photons) is also somewhat more complex than the mechanical generation
> of nonmaterial electromagnetic fields by changes in the positive (+)
> or negative (-) accelerations (changes in velocity) of various
> electrically charged particles, or the relativistic propagation
> of massless nonmaterial EMR from point A to point B through
> so-called empty space (i.e., the NED).
SINCE “massless electromagnetic radiation (photons)”
DOES NOT EXIST, IT’S PROPAGATION IS RATHER COMPLEX!
> Furthermore, in the combined new physics of TUPE and the
> The Energetic Holographic Paradigm (TEHP, pronounced “teep”)
> model of physical reality just-as-it-is, so-called empty space
> is a nonmaterial optical illusion (visual misrepresentation)
> created by the discontinuous pattern, the irregular presence
> or absence of visible macroscopic particulate matter/mass
> within the omnipresent, pervasive, nonmaterial primordial
> energy domain (NED).
BUT OF COURSE WE KNOW “SO-CALLED EMPTY SPACE”
IS CHOCK FULL OF AETHER, MADE OF PARTICLES!
> In other words, “empty space” has no separate physical reality.
SEPARATE FROM WHAT?
NONEXISTENT NOTHINGS?
> Nonetheless, the absence of visible macroscopic matter/mass
> and the presence of unseen microscopic NPE matter/mass is
> sometimes exemplified by ad hoc concepts like the luminiferous
> ether Maxwell included and SRT excluded, or vacuum energy,
> quantum foam, or the Dirac sea, for example.
WHICH ARE ALL NAMES FOR THE AETHER!
YOU ARE ESSENTIALLY TRYING TO
DESCRIBE THE AETHER, BUT YOU
THINK THAT IT’S NONPHYSICAL!
THAT’S WHY YOU CAN’T
EVER GET ANYWHERE!
> Contrary to philosophers and physicists from Aristotle to Einstein,
> so-called unseen, intangible “empty” space that contains no visible
> macroscopic matter/mass can be seen as simply the conspicuous panoptic
> obverse of the fundamental, irreducible, nonmaterial primordial energy
> domain (NED).
IF YOU FIRST STIPULATE THAT
PARTICLES ARE NONMATERIAL!
> Electromagnetic radiation and the water wave analogy:
>
> For nearly one hundred years the fundamental tone of electromagnetic
> theory and practice was set by the third paragraph of the
> Einstein-Marić 1905 photoelectric effect paper which states:
>
> “According to the assumption to be contemplated here,
> when a light ray is spreading from a point, the energy is not
> distributed continuously over ever-increasing spaces, but
> consists of a finite number of energy quanta that are localized
> in points in space, move without dividing, and can be absorbed
> or generated only as a whole.”
YES! LIGHT IS PARTICLES!
> First, a bit of history.
>
> According to the traditional water wave analogy of Huygens, Young,
> and Maxwell, et al., there are certain similarities between the
> propagation of visible light produced by a point source and
> classical water waves created on the calm surface of a pond or
> pool of water when a pebble or stone is lobbed into it.
YES! MANY SIMILARITIES!
LOTS OF PARTICLES BOUNCING AROUND!
> Hence the transverse (lateral, orthogonal) electric and
> magnetic fields of each massless monochromatic photon can be seen as
> somewhat analogous to the mechanical rising and falling waves on the
> surface of the water that move transversely (radially) away from the
> point at which the object entered the water.
IGNORING THE FACT THAT ALL PHOTONS
HAVE MASS, MOMENTUM, AND PRESSURE!
> Thomas Young (1773-1829), a polymath and medical doctor,
> was appointed in 1801 as the first professor of natural
> philosophy (physics) at the recently organized Royal
> Institution of Great Britain in London, England.
=====================================
STEVEN RADO WILL BE APPEARING AT
THE NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ASSOCIATION
CONVENTION IN JUNE IN LONG BEACH, CA.
THE HEAD OF THE ASSOCIATION WILL BE
READING PART OF AETHRO-DYNAMICS TO
THE GENERAL CONVENTION! FLY IN TO
MEET STEVEN NOW! NOT MANY CAN SAY
THEY ACTUALLY KNEW THE GREATEST EVER!
=====================================
> Young dramatically improved the water wave analogy of
> Christiaan Huygens by simultaneously dropping two pebbles
> of equal size into a calm pond of water to demonstrate the
> phenomenon of wave interference. Augustin-Jean Fresnel
(pronounced fray-Nell) further improved Huygens’ principle in
> 1818.
HE DID GOOD!
> Young demonstrated wave interference in his public lectures by using a
> novel two-slit teaching device. He described the demonstration in the
> published version of lecture Thirty-nine, On the Nature of Light and
> Colours:
>
> “Supposing the light of any given colour to consist
> of undulations, of a given breadth, or of a given frequency,
> it follows that these undulations must be liable to those
> effects which we have already examined in the case of the
> waves of water, and the pulses of sound. It has been shown
> that two equal series of waves, proceeding from centres near
> each other, may be seen to destroy each other’s effects at
> certain points, and at other points to redouble them; and
> the beating of two sounds has been explained from a similar
> interference. We are now to apply the same principles to
> the alternate union and extinction of colours.
>
> “In order that the effects of two portions of light
> may be thus combined, it is necessary that they be derived
> from the same origin, and that they arrive at the same point
> by different paths, in directions not much deviating from each
> other. This deviation may be produced in one or both of the
> portions by diffraction, by reflection, by refraction, or by
> any of these effects combined; but the simplest case appears
> to be, when a beam of homogeneous light falls on a screen in
> which there are two very small holes or slits, which may be
> considered as centres of divergence, from whence the light
> is diffracted in every direction. In this case, when the
> two newly formed beams are received on a surface placed so
> as to intercept them, their light is divided by dark stripes
> into portions nearly equal, but becoming wider as the surface
> is more remote from the apertures, so as to subtend very nearly
> equal angles from the aperatures at all distances, and wider
> also in the same proportion as the aperatures are closer to
> each other. The middle of the two portions is always light,
> and the bright stripes on each side are at such distances,
> that the light, coming to them from one of the aperatures,
> must have passed through a longer space than that which comes
> from the other, by an interval which is equal to the breadth
> of one, two, three, or more of the supposed undulations,
> while the intervening dark spaces correspond to the difference
> of half a supposed undulation, of one and a half, of two
> and a half, or more.”
VERY GOOD!
> (Note: A minor typo in the original text was corrected in
> Paragraph 1 above.)
>
> The analogy between water wave mechanics, massless electromagnetic
> radiation, and photon propagation breaks down at this point by
THE INCLUSION OF “MASSLESS
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION,”
WHICH DOES NOT EXIST!
> focusing attention on the transverse waves rather than the
> discrete object or photon that creates the transverse waves.
> Clearly, compared to the motion of the primary object,
> the rising and falling transverse waves created in
> a water or nonmaterial primordial energy (NPE) medium
> are a secondary effect.
NONMATERIAL PRIMORDIAL ENERGY
IS ALWAYS A SECONDAY EFFECT,
BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST!
> In other words, by entering the water it is the pebble or stone that
> creates the transverse waves on the plane surface of the water medium.
> And, by sinking vertically straight to the bottom, the material object
> is analogous to the discrete energetic electromagnetic photon that
> generates the orthogonal electric and magnetic transverse waves of
> monochromatic electromagnetic radiation within the NPE medium as it
> travels at the constant speed of light from emission point A to
> absorption point B regardless of time or distance.
NEATLY FINESSING THE FACT THAT
THE NPE MEDIUM DOES NOT EXIST!
> Contemporary double-slit experiments use a variety of methods and
> objects of interest such as photons and electrons. In contemporary
> quantum mechanics, for example, the results of double-slit
> experiments like those of Akira Tonomura, et al., Hitachi Ltd, Japan,
> are currently understood as demonstrations of wave-particle duality.
WHO CARES WHAT QUANTUM MECHANICS THINKS?
IT’S JUST INSANE MATHEMATICAL NONSENSE!
> Especially notice that the combined new physics of TUPE and TEHP
> imply that the medium between the source and the recording device
> of a quantum double-slit experiment is comprised not only of the
> ambient atmospheric molecules, atoms, and electrons, the medium is
> also fundamentally, irreducibly comprised of the omnipresent,
> pervasive nonmaterial primordial energy (NPE) that constitutes
> the indispensable NED which is commonly misidentified as empty space.
EMPTY SPACE DOES NOT EXIST!
NEITHER DO NPE OR NED!
YOU ARE BASICALLY TRYING
TO DESCRIBE THE AETHER,
WHICH IS MADE OF PARTICLES
THAT HAVE MASS, MOMENTUM
AND PRESSURE!
SO YOU GOT PROBLEMS!
> Beyond the classical and quantum mechanical paradigms:
>
> The first law of the universal principle of primordial energy (TUPE)
> states that fundamental, irreducible nonmaterial primordial energy
> (NPE) exists in the absence of matter, but matter is entirely
> dependent upon NPE and cannot exist in the absence of NPE.
YOU ARE CONFUSING THE AETHER,
WHICH IS COMPOSED OF PARTICLES,
WITH THE NONMATERIAL PRIMORDIAL
ENERGY, WHICH DOES NOT EXIST!
> The first law of nonmaterial primordial energy (NPE),
> therefore, implies the identical nature of NPE
> and material matter/mass within the fundamental,
> irreducible, nonmaterial primordial energy domain (NED)
> of physical reality just-as-it-is.
SO NONMATERIAL = MATERIAL!
THAT’S HOW PARTICLES
ARE MADE OF NOTHINGS!
THAT EXPLAINS EVERTHING!
> It follows that material matter/mass is fundamentally a discrete,
> organized aggregation (change of state, phase transition) of NPE
> generated within the fundamental, irreducible nonmaterial primordial
> energy domain (NED). Physical reality just-as-it-is necessarily is,
> therefore, a complex open (mechanically nonconservative)
> nonmaterial/material system as opposed to a closed or isolated
> (mechanically conservative) material system.
SOMETHING IS ACTUALLY
CAREFULLY ORGANIZED
AND COMPLEX NOTHINGS!
> Classical physics is fundamentally the history of classical mechanics.
THAT PRETTY MUCH TRUE, BUT YOU
DON’T REALLY UNDERSTAND IT AT ALL!
> Classical mechanics, in turn, was extended into the
> microscopic realm by quantum mechanics.
ACCORDING TO THE QUANTUM MECHANICS!
> Nonetheless, while classical physics and
> contemporary quantum mechanics are valid in closed or isolated
> (mechanically conservative) material systems,
NO!
QUANTUM MECHANICS IS
CRAP IN ALL SYSTEMS!
> classical and quantum mechanics are separately and collectively
> insufficient for describing the new physics of the complex open
> (mechanically nonconservative) nonmaterial primordial energy
> domain (NED) implied by TUPE.
QUANTUM MECHANICS IS INSUFFICIENT
TO EXPLAIN ANYTHING AT ALL!
CLASSICAL MECHANICS EXPLAINS EVERYTHING,
WHEN YOU PUT IT TO WORK ON THE AETHER!
> Briefly summarizing the history of contemporary physics,
> Isaac Newton’s physics and Christiaan Huygens’ light waves
> in the late 17th century are mechanical. James Clerk Maxwell’s
> mid-19th century physics and electromagnetic waves are mechanical.
YES! THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE IS MECHANICAL!
> The unexpected, unrecognized harbinger of nonmechanical,
> nonmaterial quantum physics was Max Planck’s intuitive
> discovery of the thermodynamic blackbody radiation energy
> quantum of action which he presented to his colleagues on
> 14 December 1900, the zeroth year of the 20th century.
BUT IT WAS JUST
AS WRONG THEN
AS IT IS NOW!
> The Einstein-Marić team submitted four technical papers and
> Albert’s Ph.D dissertation to Annalen der Physik for publication
> in 1905:
>
> 1. On a Heuristic Point of View Concerning the Production
> and Transformation of Light, (received 18 March 1918).
>
> 2. A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions, Ph.D.
> dissertation, University of Zürich, (received 11 May 1905).
>
> 3. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, (received 30
> June 1905).
>
> 4. On the Movement of Small Particles Suspended in
> Stationary Liquids Required by the Molecular-Kinetic Theory
> of Heat, (received 19 August 1905).
>
> 5. Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy
> Content?, (received 27 September 1905).
>
> The first four were published in Annalen der Physik, Volume 17.
> The fifth paper was published in Volume 18.
WHO CARES?
> Louis de Broglie (pronounced “de Broy”), after serving in the
> French army during World War I, postulated the wave nature of
> electrons in his 1924 doctoral thesis. Erwin Schrödinger
> published a series of four papers in 1926 in which the third
> paper proved that his particle wave mechanics were precisely
> equivalent to Werner Heisenberg’s 1925 matrix mechanics. In
> his fourth paper Schrödinger developed a particulate matter
> wave mechanics equation that changes with time based on the
> conservation of nonrelativistic mechanical energy. The results
> of the relativistic Schrödinger equation developed later are also
> limited to the material domain.
YES!
PHYSICS IS THE STUDY OF THE
PHYSICAL UNIVERSE! SURPRISED?
> In 1927 Heisenberg developed the uncertainty principle that
> describes the inherent inability of quantum mechanics to
> simultaneously measure the precise position and momentum
> of a material particle. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
> was later extended to include the inability of quantum mechanics
> to simultaneously measure kinetic energy and time with precision.
QUANTUM MECHANICS IS PURE CRAP!
DON’T BE SHOCKED BY IT MANY FAILINGS!
> Interestingly, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle delimits only the
> material domain described by classical physics and quantum mechanics.
YES!
THAT’S THE WHOLE
IDEA OF PHYSICS!
THE QUANTUM MECHANICS
NEGATE MATERIALITY IN
FAVOR OF STATISTICS!
THAT’S WHY IT’S CRAP!
> The development of contemporary quantum physics
> continues to be a work in progress, thus there
> are many interpretations of quantum mechanics.
WHICH ARE ALL CRAP!
> Moreover, despite the constraints of the mechanical
> paradigm and the matter argument, the advancement
> in quantum theory and practice since the 1920s has
> trended in the general direction of the NED, especially
YES! BOTH ARE CRAP!
> in the areas of quantum chromodynamics, vacuum energy,
> dark energy, vacuum polarization, virtual particles,
> and self-energy.
MOST OF WHICH ARE CRAP TOO!
> Please visit http://hermital.org/ to view the inline links
> and footnotes essential to understanding the new concepts above.
GOOD LORD!
GIVE IT A REST!
> Last Edit: May 21, 2010.
>
> Copyright © 2004-2010 by Alan T. Williams. All rights reserved
THIS PAPER CONVINCES ME THAT
WANK EXPANDS INFINITELY AT C^2!
AS IT’S RELEVANCE APPROACHES ZERO!
YOU START FROM THE BIZARRE ASSUMPTION OF
“massless nonmaterial electromagnetic radiation”
WHICH EVEN THIS HIGH SCHOOLER KNEW HAD BEEN
DECISIVELY DISPROVEN … ALMOST 50 YEARS AGO!
I’VE SEEN THE PROOF MYSELF: OVER AND OVER!
IT’S SO SIMPLE, A CHILD CAN GET IT EASILY!
THE *ONLY* PLACE TO GO FROM THERE IS *DOWN*!
AT LEAST YOU DIDN’T DISAPPOINT ME ON *THAT*!
YOUR *ONLY* HOPE
IS TO READ RADO!
HE EASILY SOLVES ALL OF
YOUR NONEXISTENT PROBLEMS!
IF YOU REPLACE YOUR NPE/NED WANK
WITH RADO’S LUMINIFEROUS AETHER,
SUDDENLY THE UNIVERSE WORKS
PROPERLY, AND IS UNDERSTANDABLE!
AT LEAST YOU TRIED!
SO YOU PROBABLY HAVE
SOME INTEREST IN PHYSICS!
DO YOU LIKE TO WATCH “LOST”?
NOW YOU ALSO HAVE THE KEY TO
ACTUAL PHYSICAL UNDERSTANDING:
http://www.amazon.com/Aethro-dynamics-Steven-Rado/dp/0966757181
THANKS FOR WRITING!
O
— )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/?p=2228
THE NOBUL PRIZE